Join BNMS | Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In
President's blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (28) posts »
 

BNMS President's blog - August 2023

Posted By Caroline Oxley, 14 November 2023
Updated: 17 November 2023

What does quality look like? 
Part 1: Communication

I must start by saying that my experience of Nuclear Medicine departments is that we generally look after our patients beautifully while they are in our departments. And if you don’t think that’s true for your department, then you should make your feelings known, whatever your role.

However, I have recently been thinking a lot about how good our patients’ overall experience is. What do they consider to be a quality service? Is there anything that we can do better?

I think it can be easy to forget, when we talk about our patients, that sometimes WE are the patients.  Like many of you, I’ve had this experience. Not in Nuclear Medicine, but in other areas. And in most aspects, our wonderful NHS has been brilliant. But there were some opportunities to improve – for example in communication and the interface between different services and organisations. I’d like to share some of these experiences, as some of it may give some food for thought:

1. I like to think I’m a fairly intelligent woman, and I really don’t like being called sweetheart by someone I don’t know. In fact, I’m not that keen when it’s someone I do know. My brother-in-law, who I like very much, occasionally gets away with it. I’d rather someone used my name – and gave me theirs. This irritates me a lot, and I know I’m not the only one. 

2. I don’t like things being done ‘to me’. One example of this was when my 3 year old son was in traction for 4 weeks and had to stay in hospital. He was well looked after, and the nursing and medical care was good, but looking after a young child and keeping him occupied in hospital for that length of time was a challenge. We ended up with quite a lot of ‘stuff’ in the bed bay. I kept it very organised and for that time, it essentially became home. However, one day the nurses, without anyone saying anything to me, started moving everything. Suddenly having someone start to handle all our things without knowing why was alarming and upsetting. We were being moved to another bay, which was fine, but a simple conversation beforehand would have alleviated the upset. Letting patients know what is happening to them and why is important.

3. Another thing I really don’t like is when things have to repeated for what seems no good reason – what a waste of resource. My mum has recently been unwell and saw her respiratory consultant at her local hospital. He ran some blood tests and contacted us to say she needed to go to A & E that day. He wanted her put on a drip for severe dehydration and dangerously low potassium levels. We took her in to the emergency department (at the same Trust) and had to wait for hours to be seen, after which time, all the blood tests had to be repeated before anything could be done. My poor little mammy – 86 and confused, waiting all that time, and not going to the toilet even once because she’s so dehydrated (she’s normally a very habitual user of the facilities). She went to A & E at teatime, and it was past midnight before she was put on a drip. Why did it take so long, considering a consultant at the same organisation had said for her to go in, and why did we have to repeat blood tests? I know this isn’t directly relatable to Nuclear Medicine, but the communication between departments within our hospitals and the interface between different organisation is definitely something that can be improved in my experience. And it may be that the poor communication comes from other departments, but as far as the patient is concerned, they don’t see where it arises. It’s worth a review to see if we can affect any improvements. How educated are the ward and medical staff about Nuclear Medicine tests? Could we improve this, and by doing so, improve the experience of our patients? 

I consider the visit to our Nuclear Medicine departments as the meat in the referral sandwich. There is a slice of bread before they arrive, and this is the part where we communicate the details of the test or treatment they are being invited to have. How good is that communication? How many of us are communicating the appointment information in the patient’s own first language, for example? In the area where my Trust is located, for a large proportion of the population we serve, this isn’t English. Wouldn’t it be more reassuring and welcoming if some of our direct communication with them also provided some information in their own language? You may think this is too difficult, or maybe even disagree, but have you asked your patients about it? 

The final slice of the sandwich is what happens after the patient has been for their appointment. If I have a test for something at the hospital and don’t get the result for 5 months, do I really view this as a quality service, even if the people were lovely? If the result is likely to take a long time, are we giving the patient realistic time frames? And if a result slips through the net and for some reason, is late being reported, are we being open about it and apologising?
So going back to the question about whether you have asked your patients – many of us do gather feedback, but it can be quite passive. We sometimes get lovely thank you letters (and occasionally even sweet treats). We may have a box for suggestions, and we respond to any complaints received. But do we actively ask them for feedback? I know it takes time to process when it is returned, so it may not be something we’re able to do continuously, but could you consider how to do this in some way, if you’re not already?

If you’re wondering where to start with this, the BNMS can help. We have a patient advocate named Adrian Hardy on the BNMS Council, and who better to help us gather feedback from patients. He has put together some questions he feels would give us a better overview of how patients feel about their experiences. He has made this available on our website for you to give to your patients. Patients need only answer the questions that they see as relevant to their experience. Adrian would like to co-ordinate the feedback on a national level, so please ask your patients to send their answers to Adrian at apaulhardy@aol.com or if they’d like to speak with Adrian send him a text on 07707 901953 and he will get back to them.  

You can find the information at: 
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.bnms.org.uk/resource/resmgr/patient_information_leaflets/v2_patient_experience_feedba.pdf

I hope you’ve found this interesting! Find me on X (formerly known as Twitter) @PresBnms

Ms Jilly Croasdale
BNMS President

 

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink | Comments (0)
 

 

 

© 2013 BNMS unless otherwise stated.
The BNMS is a registered as a company in England and Wales with number 08082786.  The BNMS is a charity governed by the rules of the Charity Commission for England and Wales - Registered Number 1150234.  Registered Office: The Royal College of Physicians, 11 St. Andrew's Place, Regent's Park, London NW1 4LE.
The British Nuclear Medicine Society is not able to give specific clinical advice to members of the public. If you are concerned about your scan or therapy please seek the opinion of a nuclear medicine clinician where you were seen or the clinician who referred you to the department or your GP.
Enquiries related to issues such as internships and work experience opportunities, should be directed to the relevant professional body e.g., for radiologists, this will be the Royal College of Radiologists.